Recently, a popular invention favored by smokers trying to find a safer alternative to cigarettes has come under fire from the World Health Organization. In a report by The Telegraph, e-cigarettes are thought to release more chemicals into the air than traditional cigarettes and therefore have the potential to be equally as harmful as their tar-infused counterparts. Or, as the World Health Organization fears, the vapors produced could be even more dangerous, particularly to those who involuntarily breathe in the second hand fumes.

Numerous organizations across the nation have followed in the footsteps of the WHO by banning the use of these electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) indoors. Included in these is Millikin University, which already had an all-encompassing indoor tobacco use ban in place. The University’s recent decision has already fallen into controversy on campus.

The decision, in a health standpoint, does make some sense. However, this does not mean I support it. First off, ENDS, like any other approved consumable item, are a matter of personal choice. A number of foods and drinks, such as alcohol or foods high in fat or cholesterol, can be known to cause health problems of an equal extent as ENDS. However, we have no bans, legally speaking, on any other consumable items even if they are potentially a matter of health.

Secondly, the matter of second-hand ‘smoke’ is made into a greater issue than it should be. While the vapor produced by ENDS still contains some chemicals and carcinogens, they are not produced in nearly the same quantity or extent. Mainly, ENDS contain no tobacco and thus no tar, one of the major carcinogens found in traditional cigarettes. Therefore, as a method of quitting, ENDS seem to be one of the best options.

Furthermore, like any other age-appropriate legal drug, ENDS could be used appropriately and with discretion. For instance, alcohol is allowed in dormitories assuming the door is closed, the only individuals within are of age, and everyone included agrees with the circumstances; the same could be done for ENDS. As long as the individuals affected are aware and in agreement, they should be allowed in dormitories.

However, I understand the reasoning behind a classroom ban, as it would be difficult to obtain approval from everyone within the affected area and would greet any visitors with an unprofessional appearance.

Third, since ENDS use vapor instead of smoke, they won’t leave behind any bothersome smells in dormitory buildings or classrooms alike.

While the debate against ENDS could be considered a matter of health, it is also a matter of personal choice. Given the circumstances, an over-arching ban on them seems more to me an over-reaction than a safety precaution.